Monday, August 30, 2010

Side Effects Of Popcorn

Threats on vaccinations after the soap or H1N1



After the fiasco of the vaccination campaign against "false pandemic" influenza caused by H1N1 virus, specialists in public health want to reconcile the French with the vaccine before the arrival of winter infections .

The disastrous campaign of vaccination against the H1N1 has only confirm and amplify a disturbing trend. "Dr. Robert Cohen, a pediatrician and coordinator of the network INFOVAC to hospital in Créteil, will resume his stick Pilgrim. Back to school and the inevitable return of seasonal influenza infections and winter are likely to revive debate on immunization.


GP and pediatricians will be on the front line in dealing with critics patients and parents who are sure to remind them of the serial episodes H1N1.




The Senate report on the "false pandemic" published in early August is very severe with the French government and the World Health Organization (WHO), accused of "group think that led to a substantial overestimation of risk." The document denounces pell-mell "excessive purchases", the "failure of general association" and "conflicts of interest among experts and industrialists."

Senators Alain Milon (UMP) and François Autain (Communist), authors of the report and both doctors, believe that policymakers have been blinded by the scenarios the worst "and influenced by vaccine manufacturers" in an oligopoly situation. " Industrialists have also benefited from the panic to transfer to the French state health responsibilities on any defective products. In France, 5.35 million people were immunized against H1N1 (8.23% of the population), against about 10% in Germany, 25% in the United States and nearly 65% in Sweden. The campaign has resulted in worldwide sales of vaccines estimated between 5 and 6 billion.

drop in confidence

Another survey prepared by the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe is equally critical of the institutions. According to the rapporteur of the mission, Britain's Paul Flynn (Socialist), "serious deficiencies were identified regarding the transparency of decision-making process." This document is also concerned about a "drop in reliance on advice given by public health agencies." A justified fear: almost 40% of French believe that the H1N1 vaccine was "not sure". Result This ac cumulation of blunders: the vicissitudes of political health H1N1, according to Robert Cohen, a bad blow to the "backbone of the fight against infectious diseases."

Abiker David, a columnist at the time on France Info, has followed the case by analyzing the buzz on the Internet. "This crisis marks the rout experts. The French rejected the official communication and the precautionary principle applied to the square, "says this observer in the galaxy of the Web, for whom the Internet" gives a bonus to derision and rumor. " According to Jacques Attali also interested observer of events, it is further proof of "loss of confidence in the elites of a society increasingly individualistic." These reactions disturb the confidence of public health specialist Yves Charpak, "Fighting against an invading virus is a collective war. Not to vaccinate is a selfish behavior. "

is in this context that the missionaries of Health will have to speak again before the arrival of the first frost. A more difficult exercise that vaccination has three features that blur its image: it is aimed at bienportants, protection is imperfect and it causes side effects. "It's a completely different biologic drug. Its effectiveness varies depending on the disease and patients. This uncertainty is difficult to manage, "admits Dr. Benoît Soubeyrand, medical director of Sanofi Pasteur MSD.

In fact, the act provides a dual vaccine prevention: it protects individual (I make my immune system a threat) and is a shield collective (in protecting me, I preserve my surroundings). The trouble is that this beautiful logic, which combines individualism and altruism, does not work every time. We must introduce a few statistics to understand the strategy of epidemiologists.
On the same subject

An exponential progression - Effect herd

An infectious agent (virus, bacterium or parasite) is characterized by its virulence and contagiousness. A child ill with measles or pertussis infects an average of fifteen people around him, about two cons if infected with influenza virus. But the effectiveness of a vaccine never reaches 100%. The best (measles) are close to 95%, while the worst (flu) in some years down to 60%. Control an epidemic therefore requires a military-style response: the more a disease is contagious and must vaccinate large populations quickly to cut the road to the pathogen. "This is for the herd effect," says Robert Cohen.

side effects are another weak point of the process. They are still very poorly supported by the public who accepts it difficult to run a risk with preventive therapy. Moreover, the perceived risk often has nothing to do with the actual risk. According to a Finnish study of 581 pairs of twins, the majority of problems are not modified varicella side reactions, but intercurrent events (temporally related to vaccination, but no causal relationship). But the cliches and superstitions die hard and no one likes bad news. Whoever breaks his leg the day after a vaccination will be tried link the two events and attribute his misfortune to the heirs of Pasteur. However, if he wins the lottery, he will put this on account of his good fortune.
Alain Perez, Les Echos

Saturday, August 28, 2010

French Song 2010 Slow

Narcolepsy Narcolepsy narcoineptie



Finally we found something new to the debate with the perennial concern about vaccination and especially the opponents of this therapeutic yet so effective. There 5OO new cases of narcolepsy in France, some were even brought before vaccination. Probably a pre-vaccination reaction! That deserves a big study.
We find the same nonsense made the approximation of fortuitous circumstances, as with the so-called multiple sclerosis occurred after vaccination against hepatitis B. It said many appeared not called. Therein lies the problem for a shortcut media and unscientific. Since we know that no vaccine against hepatitis B is the cause of MS, but rumors are persistent qu'imbéciles.


Some vaccinated against Influenza A (H1N1) have won a fortune e


In fact did you know that dozens of people have won the lottery after being vaccinated against H1N1? But he better not fuss made by the fear of running out of vaccines ....
Go see what they say about the earthquake in Haiti on January 12. You can imagine anyway right? Guess?
If ... These are the United States who are responsible for this earthquake. What to remain shaken!
See article

Marriage Invitation Kavithai

: a European survey on the H1N1 vaccine



Dr. Carmen Kreft-Jais, pharmacovigilance manager of the French Agency for Safety of Health Products (AFSSAPS), relativize the importance of narcolepsy-related vaccine against influenza A.

Why suggest a possible link between vaccination against influenza A and narcolepsy while the incidence of this neurological disorder has yet nothing to be alarmed?

You're right, with six cases to six million people vaccinated in France, the incidence rate is not abnormal. However, we must refine, see if new cases occur and make comparisons with previous years. There is a signal rather unusual: generally new cases of narcolepsy are not communicated to us. Unlike what happened in Sweden last week where the occurrence of these cases has generated huge media interest. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced Friday 27August having opened at the request of the European Commission, an investigation into the vaccine Pandemrix against H1N1, suspected of having caused the crises of narcolepsy in Finland and Sweden.

Why do we do we talk as Sweden, Finland and France? Are there figures for other countries?

Sweden and Finland are countries where vaccination coverage is particularly high. They are probably more attentive to potential side effects of the vaccine. In France, pharmacovigilance plays a very important role. Regarding the number of cases or other affected countries, we do not have additional statistics, we have no exact figure. We expect the scientific evaluation of the European Medical Agency (EMA).

In that case, why risk creating a new psychosis in people and not wait for the results of the EMA?

The problem is unfortunately complicated: if we do not communicate, we are taxed desire to conceal information. A Conversely, by making this public concern, we are rebuked for being too alarmist. We preferred to play the card of transparency.
By Kevin The Louargant in the Express

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

How To Get Music From Shareaza To Ipod

WHO declares the end of the pandemic of H1N1 influenza



The World Health Organization (WHO) said on Tuesday the end of the pandemic H1N1, otherwise known as influenza A. The organization decided to bring the pandemic to a mere flu.

Since its discovery in April 2009, Influenza A has been 18 500 deaths worldwide. During the pandemic, WHO has been accused of handling the crisis of H1N1 under pressure from pharmaceutical companies. The orgnaistaion was then denied the accusations: "At no time, even a second, business interests did not come into play in the decision process.